Why is it that Four Seat Ferraris are Unloved?
One can't even say two door versus four door, because they all have two doors. So, it is truly the addition of the back seat that hurts the luster. The four seat Ferrari, when new, generally sells for more than the two seat car, so it is not as though Ferrari has placed a lower intrinsic value in our heart and mind. The four seater also comes with ceramic brakes, high-end audio and a big voracious V12 power plant, so it is not as though it is missing the goods. Is there really an answer to this conundrum?
If the answer is as simple as people prefer the two seat Ferrari more than four seat cars, why does Ferrari even bother making the bigger car and how does it get away with charging extra when new? If the answer is that the four seat car doesn't look as sexy, then get Pininfarina to dig deep in their bag of design tricks and make a sexy looking four seater, like the Maserati GranTurismo.
One thing is for sure, Ferrari builds fewer four place cars than two place cars. I think there is a need in the marketplace for Ferrari to build a few four place cars for when the successful person says, "I wish my two seat Ferrari had a back seat." If the back seat were tiny, the dimensions would look better but it would realistically be an unusable back seat, like a Porsche 911, Aston Martin DB9, or Jaguar XK where legroom varies between three and zero inches. So Ferrari has wisely opted for a real back seat, which then creates potentially challenging design dimensions. Nothing gets the heart racing like a two seat Ferrari and ultimately, that adrenaline directly impacts the hearts (and wallets) of buyers who will do anything to drive a svelte sports car, which the four place Ferrari just doesn't encapsulate.
Looking at some four place Ferraris over the past few decades for a reference point are the 612 Scaglietti, 456, Mondial, 400/412 and 308 GT4. Currently, there is the king-of-the-hill 612 Scaglietti, which is arguably the best looking four place Ferrari built, even if it is oddly proportioned with an insanely long hood and near-Maybach-long wheel base. This layout places the driver far back in the car with the rear seat back almost in the trunk. Before the 612 Scaglietti was the 456 of the 1990s. This car was built for a long production run and while it has seen a lot of depreciation, it has aged well. Though subtle and understated in design, is still a lovely car that shares more than a little resemblance to the rear end of the 612 Scaglietti. Before the 456 was the angular 400/412 of the 1980s. This series car has a dated look, though upon closer inspection, it is still a good looking car, however stuck in the doldrums from a price and maintenance standpoint. There was also the Mondial and the 308 GT4 before it, both are likely the least loved Ferraris of all time and they both fit into the hardly usable backseat category.
Maybe the four place Ferrari's unloved place in the market isn't fixated only on the back seat or the diluted styling but instead on the lack of a hair raising visceral driving experience provided so uniquely by the two seat car. The longer wheelbase and heavier chassis associated with the four seater requires a big V12 and thus, the nimble, rip-roarious charm of driving the two seat V8 is markedly different. So, not only is the four seater less breath taking in appearance or bloated in weight and dimensions, but it drives like a heavy machine. Sure, it's got power to hustle, even to dance through the curvy roads, but it simply isn't as lithe as the mid-engine V8 strapped for just two. Ferrari clearly does two seaters better than anyone in the business.
I think Ferrari has the approach correct. Since history says a four seat Ferrari won't hold a strong cache once it sells beyond the original owner, their charging a premium on the few they do build and then letting the market be the judge in years to come. Build them as powerful and beautiful as possible, with the help of Pininfarina. And then, take solace in knowing that when you get to the stage in life when you need a Ferrari with a back seat, you have two choices: buy the chart-topping latest Ferrari that represents Maranello's best, or get a great deal on yesterday's glorious family-sized Ferrari. It is perplexing that the four seat Ferrari doesn't fare better than they do, but history seems to show that there is a limited interest in the market place.
Labels: Club Sportiva, exotic car share club, Ferrari 456, Ferrari 612 Scaglietti, four seat Ferrari, Pininfarina, V12



8 Comments:
You're right about the 612, it's an amazing car and most four seaters don't get the respect. I owned one of the few 400i models with a manual transmission back in the day and regret selling it. I have been looking for an opportunity to drive the Scaglietti since I read about the China endurance drive. WHen are you getting yours and how much will it cost to rent?
Current rumors in the auto industry press are that Ferrari is ending production shortly on the 612 Scaglietti, which if true, further proves the point that the four seaters are under appreciated by the marketplace. Club Sportiva has had no real Member interest in a 612, so we haven't really see any demand to get one. Again, further proving the interest in two seat Italians. It is a shame, no doubt.
Motor trend has an amazing tour of the 612 Scaglietti production facility - extremely detailed and very fascinating. Have more than a few minutes available if you click the link. Ferrari 612 Scaglietti Factory Tour
Yeah, the 612 is about as handsome as the McCedes SLR with those piggy little eyes and flat butt. I'd take the Bentley GT any day over the Scag considering it's power, price and rear seatness. But even then, it's heritage runs about as deep as the Volkswagen Jetta bloodline it has in the 2 VR6's stapled together under the hood. At least the Ferrari's bloodline is pure Italian and not a tainted british Beef Wellington mixed with kraut and weiners.
You certainly have a creative approach to the topic. The 550 hp Conti GT does motivate it with ample torque on tap in any gear. On the other hand, the 612 is made in such rare numbers that only exclusivity, aside from the Prancing Horse brand, trumps the Bentley. Both are great, but the Ferrari has loads of Italian passion baked into the equation making it hard to beat.
Ironically there are two 612s in my building's garage to one 430, and I don't think they look that bad.
In response to soji - to say the 612 has "piggy little eyes and flat butt" when comparing it to the Continental GT is a pot calling the kettle black. That being said - the Bentley is a much more practical car, and when you buy anything with more than 2 seats practicality is not an insignificant factor. Of course every third string "baller" in LA drives one, so the exclusivity factor is lacking to say the least.
If you have two 612s in your building's garage you likely have the only two in NorCal parked at your place or you live next to a Ferrari dealer.
I wouldn't exactly say the Conti GT is less than exclusive - that's like saying diamonds are commonplace because every woman has one on her hand. I would, however, say the 612 is a rare bird.
This gets back to the point of my blog post. Why is the 612 so rare? Because people don't snap up four seat Ferraris and as a result, they drop in value. I am not saying I agree with this mentality, but it is a fact.
All right Soji and Arbitrageur, let's keep it civil. I had to reject a couple comments that were getting too personal between you. The point of the Blog is to share fresh perspectives, not go at one another directly. We each have our perspectives. If we all liked the same cars, things would get boring fast. Please continue making comments, as it keeps things interesting, but to get them published, they have to be valued added.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home